November 25, 2024

Information reaching Kossyderrickent has it that SSSniperwolf is possibly BAN evading after re-uploaded videos from her unmonetized channel in December 2017 to her YouTube monetized channel. 




SSSniperwolf is possibly BAN evading according to Reddit user after re-uploading videos from her unmonetized channel to her monetized channel. 😮‼️


Do you think YouTube will do anything to really punish her?

Redditor wrote: “It’s not violating YouTube’s ban evasion policy if you re-upload you videos from a channel that isn’t monetized on a monetized channel right?” 

SSSniperwolf wrote: “Let me start by saying I’m sorry for my recent actions; it is inexcusable. I’m sorry to Jacksfilm, YouTube, the entire creator community, and my incredible fans for not being a better example for appropriate conflict resolution. Jacksfilm, while we certainly don’t see eye to eye and have our differences, I am sorry for reacting the way I did when I should’ve taken the opportunity to show young creators how adults and professionals resolve conflict by communicating directly, respectfully, and privately; not for views or content, but a meaningful example of how conflict should be solved. I will reach out directly and hope we can find some time to connect and communicate, respectfully. I’d also like to thank YouTube for holding me accountable. I deserve it, respect the decision and appreciate the opportunity to learn and grow from a true lapse in judgement.”


“Confirming SSSniperWolf has received a temporary monetization suspension per Creator Responsibility policies. Off platform actions that put others’ personal safety at risk harm our community & the behavior on both sides isn’t what we want on YT. Hoping everyone helps move this convo to a better place,” they said.


However, instead of acknowledging her wrongdoings and making amends, Lia accused Jack of stealing her “content” multiple times. On July 27th 2023, Jack addressed these accusations directly in his video. In this video, Jack expresses his strong disapproval of SSSniperWolf’s content, particularly her repetitive, lazy, and generic TikTok reaction videos. He argues that her success is undeserved, as it comes at the expense of multiple creators whom she never sought permission from to react to or profit from their work. To support his claim, Jack and his team reached out to 9 creators whose videos were reacted to by SSSniperWolf. All of them confirmed that they were never asked for permission, and some were even unaware that she had reacted to their videos. One notable example was an animation by TheJege12, which was reuploaded to TikTok by someone else and then reacted to by SSSniperWolf (essentially freebooting a freebooter). Her reaction video received 13.6 million views, while the original video only received 1.6 thousand views.

SSSniperWolf, also known as Lia, has been consistently stealing content from other creators for her reaction videos without adding any value or giving due credit. Her reactions are very lazy, and often stolen. This blatant disregard for original content creators is not only unethical but also against the principles of fair use that govern the platform.


Lia’s actions have allowed her to amass an estimated annual salary of $11 million while those whose work she uses struggle to get their rightful share. Recently, fellow YouTuber jacksfilms took a stand against this by creating a parody channel called JJJacksFilms in order to highlight Lia’s unscrupulous practices, by making non-transformative reactions to Lia’s videos.


“Let me start by saying I’m sorry for my recent actions; it is inexcusable. I’m sorry to Jacksfilm, YouTube, the entire creator community, and my incredible fans for not being a better example for appropriate conflict resolution,” she said.


“Jacksfilms, while we certainly don’t see eye to eye and have our differences, I am sorry for reacting the way I did when I should’ve taken the opportunity to show young creators how adults and professionals resolve conflict by communicating directly, respectfully, and privately; not for views or content, but a meaningful example of how conflict should be solved. I will reach out directly and hope we can find some time to connect and communicate, respectfully.


Another said: “The punishment doesn’t match the literal crime. Stop playing favorites and being deliberately cryptic.”


A third commented: “Temporary? So the YouTube official response is that we can dox people every X weeks, where X is determined by how much the YouTube team simps for them?”


Discover more from KossyDerrickent

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Discover more from KossyDerrickent

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading