Information reaching Kossyderrickent has it that OnlyFans porn creator, Luisa Espinoza, dragged for allowing young boy touch her breast after luring him with sweets and chocolates.
The clip that almost reached 40,000 views was removed after intense reproach from citizens who asked the Prosecutor’s Office and the Ministry of Education to investigate the case. There is no record of exactly when the video was recorded, but Espinoza has confirmed that the idea of filming herself with the students came from a friend of hers who was with her.
Luisa Espinoza, creator of sexual content on adult platforms, has generated rejection for a video that she released last Monday night in which she appears being touched by students from a school in Guayaquil. There she was seen at the wheel of a vehicle, offering sweets to young people who had finished the afternoon shift and whose faces cannot be seen. Before giving them the gift, she uncovers her breasts and asks the students to touch her. they access.
We asked the guys before filming and told them that we were going to cover their faces. They said yes. I calculated them about 16 or 17 years. We made the video, I only put the part where they touched me,” Espinoza revealed to Expreso newspaper. “I didn’t do something right, I didn’t do something right. But today, 15, 14, 13-year-olds go out of school taking drugs; That they only took my tits in a matter of seconds, that’s it. That’s it,” she continued with her reaction. The former member of a technocumbia group said that she was not justifying what she did, but said that she recorded the video to promote the platforms on which she publishes explicit sexual content.
For the lawyer Julio César Cueva, the closest thing is sexual abuse, typified in article 170 of the Comprehensive Criminal Code (COIP), which states: The person who, against the will of another, executes on her or forces her to to perform on herself or another person, an act of a sexual nature, without there being penetration or carnal access, will be sanctioned with a custodial sentence of three to five years. But Cueva is skeptical that this issue will prosper in the tax investigation and recalls that recently the Constitutional Court, in a sentence, said that those over 14 years of age can consent to acts of a sexual nature. “That is why the crime that comes closest to it is this, but I would not be so sure that the conduct is really a crime.
And if it’s not a crime, what is? “Perhaps an immoral act, but not everything immoral or unethical is a crime or contravention,” says Cueva. However, there are other warnings for those who share these images, because if it is confirmed that the recorded students are minors, child pornography would be involved, which is what the Prosecutor’s Office will investigate. In this regard, Article 103 of the COIP states that child pornography is configured when a person photographs, films, records, produces, transmits or edits visual, audiovisual, computer or electronic materials “that contain the visual representation of real or simulated nudes or semi-nude of girls, boys or adolescents in a sexual attitude”. For this crime, the person can be punished with imprisonment from 13 to 16 years.
Discover more from KossyDerrickent
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
